Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA)
- Stream Restoration Post Construction Monitoring
- Wetland Creation Post Construction Monitoring
CRI has served as a leader in the development and implementation of mitigation monitoring guidelines for the MDOT SHA since 1991. This effort has included monitoring using a quadrat sampling method prior to 1993; a transect method between 1993 and 2004, for which CRI staff provided input in its development to the Interagency Mitigation Task Force; and an aerial photographic interpretation and ground truthing method beginning in 2004 that incorporates routine wetland delineation data plots.
Pre-1993 Monitoring Method
CRI monitored over ten tidal and non-tidal constructed wetland mitigation sites for the MDOT SHA between 1991 and 1993. Mitigation sites established before 1993 were monitored using the Quadrat Sampling Method as described by the Corps of Engineers. Herbaceous vegetation was monitored within four meter-square quadrats while woody vegetation was monitored within a 20-foot radius circle around the plot center. Plots were sampled for percent vegetative aerial coverage, stem density and species diversity. Groundwater levels and surface water depths were measured throughout the sites. Soils were examined for suitable planting medium. Success of each site was based on quantity and health of established wetland vegetation, as well as soil and hydrologic conditions. CRI prepared reports for each site using guidelines set forth by MDOT SHA.
Post-1993 IMTF Monitoring Guidelines
CRI field monitored over 25 tidal and non-tidal constructed wetland mitigation sites for the MDOT SHA between 1993 and 2003. The Maryland Compensatory Mitigation Guidance developed by the Interagency Mitigation Task Force (IMTF) was used as the basis for evaluation of all sites constructed after 1993, which used a transect sampling protocol.
CRI established transects (emergent wetland sites) and transects with plots (woody wetland sites) within each wetland cover type to assess vegetative, soil, and hydrologic indicators. Groundwater monitoring wells were installed where appropriate to monitor groundwater levels. Surface water depths were also measured as appropriate. Potential wetland functions were noted at each site. Photographs were taken of each site to document succession from year to year.
CRI prepared reports using guidelines set forth by the IMTF. Sites that were determined by the results of the monitoring not to be meeting mitigation performance standards were recommended for remediation. Some of the recommended remediation actions included changes to hydrologic inputs, grading, soil amendments, and plant species selection. CRI also participated in interagency reviews of these mitigation sites to discuss successes and failures and recommendations for remedial actions.
2004 Revised Mitigation Monitoring Protocol
In 2004, CRI staff assisted in the development of new mitigation monitoring protocols for created wetlands and restored streams. CRI ran these protocols on a test basis in 2004, and they were fully implemented in 2005. CRI used the new protocols in 2005 to monitor five nontidal wetland creations and one stream restoration.
The new wetland protocols incorporate low-level aerial photography flown in early spring and late summer to photo-document site differences in vegetation and hydrology. CRI then conducted ground truthing using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Routine Wetland Delineation data plot method to determine whether wetland vegetation and hydrology was present.
Stream restoration monitoring protocols included one cross-sectional survey upstream and downstream of the work zone and two surveys through the work zone, a longitudinal profile, and pebble counts. CRI prepared a report that included a narrative of site findings, site photographs taken from established photo stations, and all completed field data forms.
Using the current stream and wetland monitoring protocols, CRI has monitored over 25 creation/restoration sites, and assisted MDOT SHA in providing remediation recommendations as needed, as well as gaining agency acceptance of successful creation/restoration sites.